首页|期刊导航|高校教育管理|基于数智评价的学科专业结构调整:内在逻辑、制度设计与实践路径

基于数智评价的学科专业结构调整:内在逻辑、制度设计与实践路径OA

Adjustment of academic discipline and major structure based on intelligent evaluation:internal logic,institutional design,and practical pathways

中文摘要英文摘要

基于控制理论的系统分析,数智评价与学科专业结构调整存在实时监测与预警提醒、精准诊断与调整优化、预测引导与前瞻布局、动态自适应与迭代升级等四种联结关系.在制度设计中,高校应秉持质量、特色、贡献三元兼顾原则,以数智评价为抓手,全面构建系统科学指标体系和多元合理标准体系,同时有效构建数智评价与学科专业结构调整关联联结机制,以科学构建数据治理框架体系筑牢数智评价基础,以系统打造高校三级链接数据驾驶舱建构数智评价支撑平台,以全面建成学位点和学科立体画像系统实现学科专业结构精准画像,以不断升级学位点动态监测和年度报告自动生成系统形成学科专业结构调整方案.

Based on system analysis grounded in control theory,the relationship between intelligent and data-driven evaluation and the adjustment of academic discipline and major structures in universities can be characterized by four types of coupling:real-time monitoring and early warning,precise diagnosis and optimized adjustment,predictive guidance and forward-looking planning,and dynamic adaptation and iterative upgrading.In terms of institutional design,universities should ensure that intelligent and data-driven evaluation adheres to the principle of balancing quality,distinctiveness,and contribution,while comprehensively building a scientific and systematic indicator framework and a diverse and reasonable standards system.At the same time,they should establish an effective coupling mechanism linking intelligent evaluation with the adjustment of discipline and major structures.Universities should construct a sound data-governance framework to lay a solid foundation for intelligent and data-driven evaluation;Develop a three-level data-cockpit system to provide a systematic platform supporting evaluation;Build multidimensional profiling systems for degree programs and disciplines to enable precise structural mapping;Continuously upgrade dynamic monitoring and annual reporting systems for degree programs to generate evidence-based adjustment plans for discipline and major structures.

梁传杰

武汉理工大学 研究生院,湖北 武汉 430070

社会科学

学科专业结构调整数智评价质量导向特色导向贡献导向

adjustment of academic discipline and major structureintelligent evaluationquality-orienteddistinctiveness-orientedcontribution-oriented

《高校教育管理》 2026 (2)

26-38,13

国家社科基金教育学重点项目(AJA220014)

10.13316/j.cnki.jhem.1673-8381.2025-2570

评论