首页|期刊导航|国际医学放射学杂志|体表光学图像引导放疗系统在乳腺癌大分割放疗中的摆位精度及剂量学研究

体表光学图像引导放疗系统在乳腺癌大分割放疗中的摆位精度及剂量学研究OA

Setup accuracy and dosimetric analysis of surface-guided radiotherapy in hypofractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 验证体表光学图像引导放疗系统(SGRT)在乳腺癌大分割放疗中的摆位精度优势,量化摆位误差与靶区剂量分布的关联,明确不同计划靶区体积(PTV)下的摆位误差控制阈值.方法 回顾性纳入乳腺癌保乳术后且完成大分割放疗的女性病人60例.根据治疗引导方式分为常规组(30例)和SGRT组(30例).采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较2组间摆位误差.采用Spearman相关分析组内SGRT摆位误差与锥形束CT(CBCT)摆位误差的相关性,并使用普通最小二乘回归法进行线性拟合.基于Eclipse治疗计划系统模拟摆位误差引起的剂量变化.采用Pearson相关分析不同摆位误差下的PTV体积与实际照射剂量的线性相关性.结果 SGRT组X、Y、Z轴的摆位误差均低于常规组(均P<0.05),且SGRT组所有病例三维摆位误差均<0.4 cm;SGRT摆位误差结果与CBCT配准结果呈高度正相关(r=0.81~0.91,均P<0.001),2种方法所得摆位误差数据的拟合度优异,具有高度一致性.结合剂量学模拟,整体摆位误差>0.4 cm时靶区剂量偏差显著增大,Z轴最为敏感.PTV体积与实际投照剂量的线性相关性存在显著轴向差异,Z轴在摆位误差0.4 cm及±0.5 cm时两者呈中度相关,-0.4 cm时呈弱相关;X轴在摆位误差-0.4 cm及-0.5 cm时两者呈弱相关,Y轴在各摆位误差下均无显著线性相关,其中对于PTV<400 cm³的病人,Z轴的摆位误差需控制在0.2 cm内.结论 SGRT为乳腺癌大分割放疗提供了精准、安全、无创的引导,可降低辐射暴露及病人心理负担,优化治疗流程;Z轴的摆位误差阈值需按PTV体积分层设定.

Objective To evaluate the setup accuracy of surface-guided radiotherapy(SGRT)in hypofractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer,to quantify the relationship between setup errors and target dose distribution,and to determine setup error control thresholds according to different planning target volume(PTV)sizes.Methods Sixty female patients with breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery and completed hypofractionated radiotherapy were retrospectively enrolled.According to the treatment guidance method,patients were divided into a conventional setup group(n=30)and an SGRT group(n=30).Setup errors between the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.Spearman correlation analysis was performed to assess the association between SGRT-derived setup errors and cone-beam computed tomography(CBCT)registration errors,followed by linear fitting using ordinary least squares regression.Dose variations caused by simulated setup errors were evaluated using the Eclipse treatment planning system.Pearson correlation analysis was applied to investigate the linear relationship between PTV volume and actual delivered dose under different setup error conditions.Results Setup errors along the X,Y,and Z axes in the SGRT group were significantly smaller than those in the conventional group(all P<0.05),and the three-dimensional setup errors of all SGRT cases were<0.4 cm.SGRT-derived setup errors showed a strong positive correlation with CBCT-based registration results(r=0.81-0.91,all P<0.001),demonstrating high consistency between the two methods.Dosimetric simulation revealed that when the overall setup error exceeded 0.4 cm,target dose deviations increased markedly,with the Z-axis showing the highest sensitivity.Significant axial differences were observed in the linear correlation between PTV volume and delivered dose.For the Z-axis,a moderate correlation was identified at setup errors of 0.4 cm and±0.5 cm,and a weak correlation at-0.4 cm.For the X-axis,a weak correlation was observed at-0.4 cm and-0.5 cm,whereas no significant linear correlation was found for the Y-axis at any setup error level.Notably,in patients with PTV<400 cm³,the Z-axis setup error should be controlled within 0.2 cm.Conclusion SGRT provides accurate,safe,and non-invasive guidance for hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer,reducing radiation exposure and patient psychological burden while improving workflow efficiency.Setup error thresholds along the Z-axis should be individualized based on PTV volume to ensure optimal dose delivery.

张卫恒;赵学会;邹炳;李卿;周振宇;兰琼玉

南昌大学第二附属医院肿瘤科,南昌 330000南昌大学第二附属医院肿瘤科,南昌 330000南昌大学第二附属医院肿瘤科,南昌 330000南昌大学第二附属医院肿瘤科,南昌 330000南昌大学第二附属医院肿瘤科,南昌 330000南昌大学第二附属医院肿瘤科,南昌 330000

医药卫生

乳腺癌保乳术大分割放疗体表光学图像引导放疗系统辐射剂量

Breast cancerBreast-conserving surgeryHypofractionated radiotherapySurface guided radiation therapyRadiation dose

《国际医学放射学杂志》 2026 (1)

50-57,8

10.19300/j.2026.L22196

评论