国家公园边界划定中的制度嵌入与地方实践研究OA
Institutional embedding and local practices in the demarcation of national park boundaries for China
在国家公园建设过程中,边界划定作为核心环节之一,常被视为技术性与制度性的工作,但实际上却深度嵌入社会权力关系与地方发展逻辑之中.以钱江源国家公园体制试点区内T村为例,文中聚焦边界划定过程中的土地权属问题,指出国家主导的确界机制不仅以自然科学与法律制度为基础排除了地方知识,也在实际操作中模糊了权属界限,激化了村庄对于发展权利的焦虑与抗争.1)边界划定以生态保护名义实现了对空间资源的重新分配.2)其标准化与去地方化的确界逻辑忽视了历史性土地使用实践与地方发展的多元期望,从而削弱了政策的社会正当性.进一步分析显示,制度设计中的程序缺位、地方认知与国家意图的不对称,以及村民实践中的隐性抵抗,共同构成了国家治理与地方响应之间的张力场.确界行动在形式上实现了保护边界的明确化,实质上却导致认同危机与治理困境的加剧.以边界划定为轴心的分析路径,有助于重新理解国家公园治理中的制度理性与地方经验之间的冲突,深化对"协作治理"转型路径的认识,也为自然保护政策中如何协调权属与发展的关系提供了现实启示.
Boundary demarcation,a core component of national park construction,is often viewed as a technical and institutional undertaking,yet in reality,it is deeply embedded in social power relations and local development logics.Taking Village T within the Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot area as a case,this article focuses on land tenure issues during boundary demarcation.It argues that the state-led demarcation mechanism not only excludes local knowledge based on natural science and legal institutions but also blurs the boundaries of tenure in practice,exacerbating villagers' anxiety and resistance over development rights.On the one hand,boundary demarcation redistributes spatial resources in the name of ecological protection,on the other hand,its standardized and delocalized demarcation logic ignores historical land use practices and expectations for diversified local development,thereby undermining the policy's social legitimacy.Further analysis reveals that procedural gaps in institutional design,asymmetries between local cognition and state intentions,and implicit resistance in villagers' practices all contribute to a tension between state governance and local responses.While the demarcation process formally clarifies conservation boundaries,but it exacerbates identity crises and governance dilemmas in reality.An analytical approach centered on boundary demarcation helps reconsider the conflict between institutional rationality and local experience in national park governance,deepens understanding of the transitional path toward"collaborative governance",and provides practical insights into the coordination of the relationship between tenure and development in nature conservation policy.
雷锦锋;刘明明
中国农业大学人文与发展学院,北京 100083中国农业大学人文与发展学院,北京 100083
社会科学
国家公园边界划定协作治理权属冲突制度调适
national parkboundary demarcationcollaborative governancetenure conflictinstitutional adaptation
《干旱区资源与环境》 2026 (2)
44-52,9
北京市社会科学基金项目(24FXB006)资助.
评论