首页|期刊导航|中国医学装备|经会阴超声动态监测胎头方向角联合头-会阴距离对剖宫产术后再妊娠阴道试产的预测价值

经会阴超声动态监测胎头方向角联合头-会阴距离对剖宫产术后再妊娠阴道试产的预测价值OA

Predictive value of trans-perineal dynamic monitoring of ultrasound on direction of fetal head angle combined with head-perineum distance for TOLAC

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探讨经会阴超声动态监测胎头方向角(FHA)联合头-会阴距离(HPD)对剖宫产术后再妊娠试产(TOLAC)的预测价值.方法:前瞻性纳入2022年1月至2024年5月广东医科大学附属东莞第一医院收治的80例符合剖宫术后阴道试产(TOLAC)指征的单胎头位孕妇,采用标准化超声方案动态监测宫口扩张5、8 cm及第二产程前的FHA与HPD,并根据最终分娩方式将其分为阴道分娩成功(VBAC)组(56例)和中转剖宫产(RCS)组(24例),绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算ROC曲线下面积(AUC),采用多因素logistic回归分析参数预测效能.结果:宫口扩张5 cm时,VBAC组平均FHA为(97.52±4.73)°,较RCS组平均FHA(84.31±4.25)°增大13.21°,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=11.786,P<0.05),宫口扩张8 cm时,VBAC组平均FHA为(88.93±4.85)°,较RCS组平均FHA(75.62±4.42)°增大13.31°,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=11.540,P<0.05);宫口扩张5、8 cm时,VBAC组HPD较RCS组均缩短,差异有统计学意义(t=3.642、4.127,P<0.05).VBAC组HPD平均变化速率(6.32±1.45)mm/h,较RCS组(3.89±1.27)mm/h快2.43 mm/h,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=3.892,P<0.05).多因素分析显示FHA≥87.8°、HPD≤44.5 mm为剖宫产术后再妊娠阴道试产的独立预测因素(OR=4.58、3.38,P<0.05).FHA联合HPD在宫口8 cm时预测效能最优,其AUC为0.892,灵敏度为84.2%,特异度为81.5%.RCS组前次产程停滞史比例高于VBAC组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(x2=4.732,P<0.05).结论:动态监测FHA与HPD可有效预测PACS分娩结局,FHA联合HPD在宫口近全阶段展现最佳预测效能.

Objective:To explore predictive value of trans-perineal dynamic monitoring of ultrasound on direction of fetal head angle(FHA)combined with head-perineum distance(HPD)for trial of labor after cesarean(TOLAC).Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 80 pregnant women whose single fetal were head position,who met the TOLAC signs and admitted to the First Hospital of Dongguan Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University between January 2022 and May 2024.A standardized ultrasound protocol was used to dynamically monitor FHA and HPD at 5 cm and 8 cm of cervical dilatations,and before the second stage of labor.Participants were subsequently divided into two groups based on the final delivery mode:successful vaginal birth after cesarean(VBAC)group(n=56)and repeat cesarean section(RCS)group(n=24).Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves were plotted,and the area under curve(AUC)of ROC curve was calculated.The efficacy was predicted by using parameters of multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results:When cervical dilatation was 5 cm,the mean FHA was(97.52±4.73)° in the VBAC group,which increased 13.21° than(84.31±4.25)° in the RCS group,showing a statistically significant difference(t=11.786,P<0.05).When cervical dilatation was 8 cm,the mean FHA was(88.93±4.85)° in the VBAC group,which increased 13.31° than(75.62±4.42)° in the RCS group,and the difference was significant(t=11.540,P<0.05).The HPD values of the VBAC group were significantly shorter than those of the RCS group when cervical dilatation was both 5 cm and 8 cm(t=3.642,4.127,P<0.05).The average change rate of HPD in VBAC group was(6.32±1.45)mm/h,which was faster 2.43 mm/h than(3.89±1.27 mm/h)in RCS group,and the difference was significant between two groups(t=3.892,P<0.05).Multivariate analysis identified"FHA≥87.8°"and"HPD≤44.5 mm"were independent predictors for VBAC(OR=4.58,3.38,P<0.05).The combination of FHA and HPD demonstrated optimal predictive performance at 8 cm of cervical dilatation,which AUC value,sensitivity and specificity were respectively 0.892,84.2%and 81.5%.The ratio of the history of prior labor stagnation of the RCS group was higher than that of the VBAS group,and there was significant difference between two groups(x2=4.732,P<0.05).There were statistically significant differences were observed between two groups regarding to age,gestational weeks,and other indicators at baseline(P>0.05).Conclusion:Dynamic monitoring of FHA and HPD can effectively predict delivery outcomes in pregnancy after cesarean section(PACS).The combination of FHA and HPD exhibits the best predictive efficacy at the cervix and nearly the entire stage.

龙大坚;杨茗;柏智;李仲均

广东医科大学第一临床医学院 湛江 524023||广东医科大学附属东莞第一医院产科 东莞 523710广东医科大学附属东莞第一医院产科 东莞 523710广东医科大学附属东莞第一医院产科 东莞 523710广东医科大学东莞市人民医院产科 东莞 523000

医药卫生

剖宫产术后再妊娠经会阴超声胎头方向角(FHA)头-会阴距离(HPD)产程动力学

Pregnancy after cesarean section(PACS)Perineal ultrasoundDirection of fetal head angle(FHA)Head-perineum distance(HPD)Labor dynamics

《中国医学装备》 2026 (1)

64-68,5

广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2022A1515140133) Guangdong Provincial Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2022A1515140133)

10.3969/j.issn.1672-8270.2026.01.012

评论