首页|期刊导航|中国医学装备|弧数目对鼻咽癌容积旋转调强放射治疗计划质量的影响及其可执行性分析

弧数目对鼻咽癌容积旋转调强放射治疗计划质量的影响及其可执行性分析OA

Analysis on impact of arc number on the quality of VMAT plans and on feasibility of that for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:研究弧数目对鼻咽癌容积旋转调强放射治疗(VMAT)计划质量及其可执行性的影响.方法:回顾性选取2021年至2023年柳州市工人医院收治的20例鼻咽癌患者的定位CT图像及放疗靶区,每例患者均采用RayStation计划系统设计单弧、双弧和三弧VMAT计划.鼻咽癌计划肿瘤体积(PGTVnx)处方剂量为6 996 cGy/33次,预防照射区域计划靶区(PTV5 280)处方剂量为5 280 cGy/33次,亚临床病灶区处方剂量为6 600 cGy/33次,转移淋巴结肿瘤区按高危程度给予不同的处方剂量,统计其靶区剂量、危及器官剂量、计划可执行性参数,采用单因素重复测量方差分析,Bonferroni校正法,分析其剂量学和可执行性参数之间的差异.结果:随着弧数目的增加,靶区剂量分布进一步优化,单弧、双弧、三弧计划之间比较,鼻咽癌PGTVnx的D98%、Dmean、D2%及靶区覆盖率,PTV6 996的D98%、Dmean、靶区覆盖率,PTV6 600 的D98%、Dmean、靶区覆盖率,PTV5 280的D98%、Dmean、靶区覆盖率、适形指数(CI)的差异均有统计学意义(F=36.578、29.527、130.748、28.542、19.278、21.787、15.819、24.683、16.026、16.973、86.285、100.416、88.660、21.714,P<0.05);随着弧数目的增加,部分危及器官的受照剂量降低,单弧、双弧、三弧计划的脑干D5%、左下颌骨D5%、右下颌骨D5%、右视神经D5%、口腔V50、左腮腺V30、右腮腺V30、脊髓Dmax、左颌下腺D50%、右颌下腺D50%、甲状腺D50%比较差异均有统计学意义(F=22.567、5.074、8.296、6.184、7.524、7.366、9.646、16.636、25.482、21.408、54.000,P<0.05);单弧、双弧、三弧计划的出束时间分别为(92.0±7.0)s、(153.1±2.3)s和(224.3±1.5)s,机器跳数(MU)随弧数目之间的增加而增加,MU值分别为769.1±121.1、817.4±98.9和933.7±101.4,差异均有统计学意义(F=7023.526、43.307,P<0.05).双弧和三弧计划的出束时间分别比单弧计划增加了61.15和132.35 s,双弧和三弧计划的机器跳数分别为单弧计划的1.06倍和1.21倍,三弧计划3%/3 mm条件下的验证通过率略低于其他两种计划,差异有统计学意义(F=4.925,P<0.05).结论:随着弧数目的增加,鼻咽癌靶区剂量分布显著提升,大部分危及器官的受照剂量更低,但治疗时间增加,三弧计划的执行精度下降.建议在计划设计时权衡利弊,根据计划的难易程度选择合适的弧数目.

Objective:To study the impact of arc number on quality of volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT),and the feasibility of that for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Methods:The images of computed tomography(CT),and target area of radiotherapy of 20 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who admitted to Liuzhou Worker's Hospital from 2021 to 2023 were retrospectively selected.The RayStation plan system was adopted to design single-arc,double-arc,and triple-arc VMAT plan for each patient.The prescription doses of primary gross tumor volume(PGTVnx),plan target volume(PTV5 280)of prophylactic irradiation region and subclinical lesion region of nasopharyngeal carcinoma were respectively 6,996 cGy in 33 fractions,5,280 cGy in 33 fractions,and 6,600 cGy in 33 fractions.The tumor area of metastatic lymph node received different prescription doses according to high-risk level.The dose of target area,dose of organ-at-risk(OAR),and feasibility parameter of plan were statistically analyzed.One-way analysis of variance(ANOVA)for repeated measurement data,and Bonferroni correction method were adopted to analyze the differences of these indicators between dosimetric and feasibility parameters.Results:With increasing of arc number,the distribution of the dose of target volume was further optimized.The differences of indicators(D98%,Dmean,D2%,coverage rate of target area)of PGTVnx,and indicators(D98%,Dmean,coverage rate of target area)of PTV6 996,and indicators(D98%,Dmean,coverage rate of target area)of PTV6 600,and indicators(D98%,Dmean,coverage rate of target area)of PTV5 280,and conformity index(CI)of plan for nasopharyngeal carcinoma among single-arc,double-arc,and triple-arc VMAT plan were significant(F=36.578,29.527,130.748,28.542,19.278,21.787,15.819,24.683,16.026,16.973,86.285,100.416,88.660,21.714,P<0.05).With increasing of arc number,the exposure doses of some OAR decreased.The differences of brainstem D5%,left mandible D5%,right mandible D5%,right optic nerve D5%,oral cavity V50,left parotid V30,right parotid V30,spinal cord Dmax,left submandibular gland D50%,right submandibular gland D50%,thyroid D50%among single-arc,double-arc,and triple-arc VMAT plan were significant(F=22.567,5.074,8.296,6.184,7.524,7.366,9.646,16.636,25.482,21.408,54.000,P<0.05).The beam release time of the single-arc,double-arc and triple-arc plans were respectively(92.0±7.0)s,(153.1±2.3)s and(224.3±1.5)s.The monitor unit(MU)values of machine increased with the increasing of the number of arcs,and the MU values were respectively 769.1±121.1,817.4±98.9,and 933.7±101.4,and the differences of them among the single-arc,double-arc and triple-arc plans were significant(F=7 023.526,43.307,P<0.05).The beam release time of double-arc and triple-arc plans increased respectively 61.15 s and 132.35 s than that of single-arc plans.The MU values of double-arc and triple-arc plans were respectively 1.06 times and 1.21 times that of single-arc plan.Under 3%/3 mm conditions,the pass rate of verification of triple-arc plan was slightly lower than that of other two plans,and the difference was significant(F=4.925,P<0.05).Conclusion:With the increasing of arc number,the distribution of the dose of target area of nasopharyngeal carcinoma significantly enhances,and the exposure dose of the most of OAR is lower,but the duration of treatment is extended.The precision of feasibility of triple-arc plan decreases.It is suggested that the benefit and disadvantage should be weighed in designing plan,and the appropriate arc number should be selected based on the difficult level of plan.

谭军文;王占宇;贺先桃;李钢;冯永富;梁卫学;龙雨松

柳州市工人医院肿瘤科 柳州市全程信息化精准放疗技术工程技术研究中心 柳州市恶性肿瘤智慧放疗转化重点实验室 柳州 545000柳州市工人医院肿瘤科 柳州市全程信息化精准放疗技术工程技术研究中心 柳州市恶性肿瘤智慧放疗转化重点实验室 柳州 545000柳州市工人医院肿瘤科 柳州 545000柳州市工人医院肿瘤科 柳州 545000柳州市工人医院肿瘤科 柳州 545000柳州市工人医院肿瘤科 柳州 545000柳州市工人医院肿瘤科 柳州市全程信息化精准放疗技术工程技术研究中心 柳州 545000

医药卫生

鼻咽癌容积旋转调强放射治疗(VMAT)剂量学计划验证弧数目可执行性

Nasopharyngeal carcinomaVolumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT)DosimetryVerification of planArc numberFeasibility

《中国医学装备》 2026 (1)

18-23,6

柳州市科技计划项目(2022YRZ0101,2024PA0101A013)广西重点研发计划(桂科AB22035026)广西卫健委自筹课题(Z20200966) Liuzhou Science and Technology Plan Project(2022YRZ0101,2024PA0101A013)Key Research and Development Plan Project of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region(Guike AB22035026)Self-funded Scientific Research Project of Health Commission of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region(Z20200966)

10.3969/j.issn.1672-8270.2026.01.003

评论