关键核心技术研究的逻辑脉络与整合框架:从内涵界定到企业突破路径OA
The Logical Thread and Integrated Framework of Key Core Technology Research:From Connotation Definition to Enterprise Breakthrough Paths
全球科技竞争加剧背景下,我国关键核心技术面临"卡脖子"困境,鉴于传统技术发展路径局限性日益凸显,亟须系统性梳理该领域研究脉络.首先,以"内涵特征—识别方法—影响因素—机制路径"为主线,从宏观、中观、微观等3个层面界定关键核心技术的多维内涵,剖析其价值准公共性、系统复杂性、知识复合性、控制动态性与生态依赖性等五大特征;其次,结合典型案例对概念体系进行验证,进而对比定性、定量识别方法的适用性与局限性,揭示识别方法的多源融合与智能化演进趋势,并从企业内部特质与外部支撑解析技术突破的影响因素;最后,提炼知识流动协同与组织治理适配两大作用机制,归纳资源整合、生态协同、企业主导与政府引导等4类驱动路径,构建"理论认知—方法工具—实践路径"整合框架.通过"理论构建—案例验证—路径归纳"的逻辑闭环,系统整合既有成果,弥补现有研究概念分散、框架碎片化的不足,为后续学术研究、企业实践与政策制定提供理论参照与实践指引.
Against the background of intensifying global scientific and technological compe-tition,China's key core technologies are increasingly confronting a severe"chokehold"dilemma.Given the obsolescence of traditional paths that are no longer capable of addressing the urgent need for independent control of core technologies,there is an imperative necessity to systemati-cally sort out the research context,integrate fragmented findings,and build a coherent theoreti-cal framework.Therefore,this study takes"connotative characteristics—identification methods—influencing factors—mechanism paths"as its main line,conducting a systematic combing of key core technology research.Firstly,it defines its multi-dimensional connotations from the macro,medium,and micro levels and analyzes the five inherent characteristics:the quasi-public nature of technical value,systematic complexity,knowledge comprehensiveness,dynamic con-trol,and ecological dependence.Then,the study verifies this conceptual system using typical cases from fields.It further compares the applicability and limitations of qualitative and quantita-tive identification methods.Additionally,it reveals the evolutionary trend of identification meth-ods toward multi-source integration and intelligence.Next,the study analyzes key breakthrough factors from two dimensions:internal enterprise characteristics and external support.On this ba-sis,it refines two core mechanisms:the knowledge flow coordination mechanism and the organi-zational governance adaptation mechanism.It also summarizes four driving paths:resource inte-gration,ecological coordination,enterprise leadership,and government guidance.Ultimately,this study constructs an integrated framework of"theoretical cognition—methodological tools—practical paths".Through the logical closed loop of"theoretical construction—case verification—path induction",it integrates existing achievements,addresses the deficiencies of scattered concepts and fragmented frameworks in current research,and provides theoretical references for academic exploration,practical guidance for enterprise innovation,and policy-making support for governments.
温凤媛;刘晨阳
沈阳师范大学国际商学院,辽宁 沈阳 110034沈阳师范大学国际商学院,辽宁 沈阳 110034
管理科学
关键核心技术内涵特征识别测度影响因素驱动路径知识流动协同组织治理适配技术生态
key core technologyconnotative characteristicsidentification and measure-mentinfluencing factorsdriving pathsknowledge flow coordinationorganizational governance adaptationtechnology ecosystem
《创新科技》 2026 (1)
1-15,15
2025年辽宁省教育厅高等学校基本科研项目"组态视角下高端制造业关键核心技术突破的路径研究"(LJ112510166012)2026年辽宁省经济社会发展研究课题"辽宁省高端装备制造业关键核心技术创新的财政政策组态研究"(2026lslybkt-038).
评论