首页|期刊导航|长江科学院院报|白龙江引水工程六盘山隧洞地应力分析及岩爆风险评估

白龙江引水工程六盘山隧洞地应力分析及岩爆风险评估OA

In-situ Stress Analysis and Rockburst Risk Assessment of Liupanshan Tunnel of Bailong River Water Diversion Project

中文摘要英文摘要

在深埋高应力背景下进行隧洞开挖支护等地下工程时,常伴随硬岩岩爆及软岩大变形等风险.白龙江引水工程六盘山隧洞沿线整体埋深较大,围岩岩性多以砾岩、灰岩等硬岩为主,有效预测岩爆灾害是该工程前期规划工程进度和保障施工安全的重要课题,对其地应力场的测试分析则是隧洞岩爆预测的重要环节.为探究白龙江引水工程六盘山隧洞沿线应力状态及岩爆发生概率,通过地质调查、深孔地应力测试、地应力场数值反演等方法对隧洞沿线应力特征进行分析,进而结合多种岩爆判据对隧洞沿线硬岩区域进行岩爆风险评估.研究结果表明:六盘山隧洞沿线以水平主应力为主,隧洞所选定的轴线方位合理,有利于隧洞围岩的稳定;但隧洞沿线应力量值受断层构造、地形地貌等影响较大,存在应力集中及分异现象,且大部分区域埋深较大,多属于中高地应力水平,具备岩爆发生条件.经多种岩爆判据计算分析可知,该隧洞硬岩高埋深区域存在较大的强岩爆风险,需要采用合适的岩爆防控措施.

[Objective]Taking the deeply buried Liupanshan tunnel of the Bailong River Diversion Project as the research background,this study aims to systematically investigate the distribution characteristics of the in-situ stress field along the tunnel alignment and to assess the rockburst risk of hard-rock sections under high-stress conditions,thereby providing a scientific basis for early-stage project planning,construction safety control,and support design.[Methods]A comprehensive approach combining field testing,numerical simulation,and theoretical analysis was employed.(1)Geological survey and deep-borehole hydraulic fracturing tests were conducted to obtain measured in-situ stress data from representative boreholes along the tunnel alignment.(2)Based on the measured data,a three-dimensional geomechanical model was established,and a multivariate regression inversion method was used to invert the initial in-situ stress field of the entire study area.(3)By integrating the Russenes criterion,the Turchan-inov criterion,and the criterion of the ratio of chamber damage depth,a multi-criterion comprehensive evaluation of rockburst risk was conducted for the hard-rock sections.[Results](1)In-situ stress characteristics:Along the tunnel alignment,horizontal stress was dominant,and the maximum horizontal principal stress was mainly oriented in the NEE-EW direction,forming a small angle with the tunnel axis,which was favorable for surrounding rock sta-bility.The stress magnitude increased with depth and was significantly influenced by faults and valley topography,resulting in localized stress concentration and stress differentiation.(2)Inversion verification:A comparison be-tween the measured data and inversion results from the deepest borehole ZK2301 showed good agreement in the deep zone,verifying the reliability of the inversion model.(3)Rockburst risk:The multi-criterion assessment indi-cated that rockburst risk increased with burial depth along the tunnel alignment:no rockburst at depths ≤197 m;weak rockburst at depths of 197-344 m;moderate rockburst at depths of 344-629 m;and strong rockburst at depths>629 m.Sections with strong rockburst risk accounted for a relatively large proportion of the entire tunnel,mainly concentrated in hard-rock zones with high burial depths.[Conclusion]The in-situ stress along the Liupans-han tunnel is generally at a moderate-to-high level,providing conditions conducive to rockburst occurrence.The se-lected tunnel axis orientation is reasonable and favorable for surrounding rock stability.However,strong rockburst risk exists in hard-rock sections with large burial depths.Therefore,it is recommended that appropriate rockburst monitoring and mitigation measures should be implemented for high-risk tunnel sections during construction.This study provides critical guidance for the safe construction of the project and offers valuable reference for rockburst prediction and prevention in similar deeply buried hard-rock tunnels.

董志宏;蒋健;张新辉;周朝;左清军

长江科学院水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,武汉 430010||三峡大学土木与建筑学院,湖北宜昌 443000三峡大学土木与建筑学院,湖北宜昌 443000长江科学院水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,武汉 430010长江科学院水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,武汉 430010三峡大学土木与建筑学院,湖北宜昌 443000

建筑与水利

深孔地应力测试应力场反演分析岩爆预测六盘山隧洞

deep-borehole in-situ stress testin-situ stress field inversion analysisrockburst predictionLiupans-han Tunnel

《长江科学院院报》 2026 (1)

181-190,10

云南省重大科技专项计划项目(202102AF080001,202002AF080003)中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(CKSF2023308/YT,CKSF2023316/YT)

10.11988/ckyyb.20241128

评论