首页|期刊导航|镇江高专学报|论反垄断民事公益诉讼的诉权配置

论反垄断民事公益诉讼的诉权配置OA

On the assignment of litigation rights of anti-monopoly civil public interest litigation

中文摘要英文摘要

《中华人民共和国反垄断法》(2022 年修正)第60 条第2 款将反垄断民事公益诉权单独配置给设区的市级以上人民检察院,这一做法显然与《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》(2023 年修正)第 58 条关于诉权配置的一般法相悖.赋予检察机关反垄断民事公益起诉资格固然有其合理性,但亦不能因此将社会组织排除在外.在规范层面,应构造包括检察机关、部分行业协会和消费者组织在内的多元起诉主体格局.在多元诉权配置体系内,应确定检察机关→部分行业协会和消费者组织的诉权行使顺位.

Paragraph 2,Article 60 of the Anti-monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China(2022 amendment)separately assigns the litigation rights of anti-monopoly civil public interest litigation to the people's procuratorates at or above the prefecture-level city,which is obviously contradictory to the general law on the assignment of litigation rights in Article 58 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China(2023 amendment).Granting the procuratorial organs the qualification for anti-monopoly civil public interest litigation is certainly reasonable,but it cannot exclude social organizations.At the normative level,a diverse pattern of litigation right parties should be constructed,including procuratorial organs,some industry associations,and consumer organizations.Within the diversified system of litigation rights assignment,the order of exercise of litigation rights by the procuratorial organs,some industry associations,and consumer organizations should be determined.

刘滢

江苏大学 法学院,江苏 镇江 212013

社会科学

《中华人民共和国反垄断法》民事公益诉讼诉权主体起诉顺位

Anti-monopoly Law of the People's Republic of Chinacivil public interest litigationlitigation right partieslitigation sequence

《镇江高专学报》 2026 (1)

44-49,6

国家社会科学基金项目(23BFX089)江苏省社会科学基金项目(24FXB005)

评论