首页|期刊导航|中国药业|多学科协作下门诊审方规则优化实践

多学科协作下门诊审方规则优化实践OA

Optimization Practice of Outpatient Prescription Review Rules Under Multidisciplinary Collaboration

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 推进门诊审方工作的精细化管理.方法 以妇产科、血液病科、皮肤科、肾脏内科、神经内科为例,通过医院信息系统和天际健康审方系统收集医院 2023 年 1 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日(规则维护前)和 7 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日(规则维护后)门诊处方数据及相应的审方记录,对比规则维护前后 5 个科室系统预审问题处方占比、医师提交前返回修改处方占比、药师审核处方占比及药师干预处方占比的变化情况,医师修改药师干预处方的情况和申请双签字发药情况,并分析 2023 年维护门诊审方规则中警示类型和警示级别分布情况.除妇产科系统预审问题处方占比及皮肤科和神经内科的医师提交前返回修改处方占比外,其余指标在规则维护前后的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).且规则维护后药师审核处方占比均明显升高,药师干预处方占比均显著降低(P<0.05).除妇产科外,其余科室医师修改药师干预处方情况均明显改善,各科室医师申请双签字发药情况均不同程度减少.2023 年该文作者共维护门诊审方规则 176 条,审方规则警示类型数排名前 3 的依次为无适应证用药(45.45%)、每天/单次剂量不适宜(17.61%)、给药频次不适宜(12.50%),门诊审方规则维护后的警示级别数排名前 3 的为一般警示(47.73%)、拦截(29.55%)和未启用(10.23%).结论 现阶段该院审方工作维护中存在的主要问题有审方软件基础规则导入不及时,且基础规则的警示级别不全,无法有效拦截不合理处方,以及可能干扰临床诊疗节奏,增加医师的不信任感.建议对药品用法用量开展分级管理并酌情调整警示级别,简化警示信息并给予用药建议,提升药师循证能力并持续优化审方规则,以进一步促进临床安全合理用药.

Objective To promote the refined management of outpatient prescription review work.Methods The departments of obstetrics and gynecology,hematology,dermatology,nephrology,and neurology were selected as examples,the outpatient prescription data and corresponding prescription review records from January 1 to June 30,2023(before rule maintenance)and July 1 to December 31,2023(after rule maintenance)were collected from the hospital information system and Tianji Health Prescription Review System.The changes in the proportion of pre-review problem prescription in the system,the proportion of prescriptions returned by physicians for modification before submission,the proportion of pharmacist reviewed prescriptions and the proportion of pharmacist intervened prescriptions,modification of pharmacist intervention prescriptions and application for dual signature dispensing by physicians in five departments were compared before and after rule maintenance,as well as the distribution of warning types and warning levels in the 2023 outpatient prescription review rules were analyzed.Results Except for the proportion of pre-review problem prescription in the system in the department of obstetrics and gynecology and the proportion of prescriptions returned by physicians for modification before submission in the department of dermatolog and neurolog,the differences in other indicators before and after rule maintenance were statistically significant(P<0.05).After rule maintenance,the proportion of pharmacist reviewed prescriptions was significantly increased,while the proportion of pharmacist intervened prescriptions was significantly decreased(P<0.05).Except for the department of obstetrics and gynecology,the modification of pharmacist intervented prescriptions by physicians in other departments was significantly improved,and the application for dual signature dispensing by physicians in each department was decreased to varying degrees.In 2023,a total of 176 outpatient review rules were maintained by author of this paper.The top three warning types in the review rules by quantity were medication without indications(45.45%),inappropriate daily/single dose(17.61%),and inappropriate dosing frequency(12.50%).After the maintenance of the outpatient prescription review rules,the top three warning levels by number in terms of quantity were general warning(47.73%),interception(29.55%),and inactive(10.23%).Conclusion At present,the main problems in the maintenance of the hospital's prescription review work include the untimely import of the basic rules of the prescription review software,incomplete warning levels of the basic rules,inability to effectively intercept unreasonable prescriptions,and possible interference with the clinical diagnosis and treatment rhythm,increasing the distrust of physicians.It is recommended to carry out graded management of drug usage and dosage,adjust warning levels as appropriate,simplify warning information and provide medication advice,enhance pharmacists'evidence-based ability,and continuously optimize prescription review rules to further promote clinical safe and rational drug use.

顾云霞;朱华;孙家艳;徐文俊

江苏省苏北人民医院·扬州大学附属苏北人民医院,江苏 扬州 225001江苏省苏北人民医院·扬州大学附属苏北人民医院,江苏 扬州 225001江苏省苏北人民医院·扬州大学附属苏北人民医院,江苏 扬州 225001江苏省苏北人民医院·扬州大学附属苏北人民医院,江苏 扬州 225001

医药卫生

审方规则规则维护规则优化多学科协作

prescription review rulerule maintenancerule optimizationmultidisciplinary collaboration

《中国药业》 2026 (2)

41-45,5

江苏省药学会-奥赛康医院药学科研基金项目[A202332]江苏省医院协会医院药事管理研究专项课题[JSYGY-2-2024-YS22]江苏省苏北人民医院管理课题[YYGL202403].

10.3969/j.issn.1006-4931.2026.02.008

评论