基于高标准农田小气候要素的冬小麦土壤相对湿度模拟模型OA
Simulation Model of Winter Wheat Soil Relative Humidity Based on High-standard Farmland Microclimate Factors
利用 2021-2023 年冬小麦生长期(10 月-翌年 5 月)高标准农田小气候监测数据,在分析土壤水分对农田小气候要素响应滞后性的基础上,引入 Optuna 框架的超参数优化方法建立随机森林(Random forest,RF)、BP神经网络(BP neural network,BPNN)和支持向量机回归(Support vector regression,SVR)3 种机器学习模型,预估 3d、5d和 10d共 3 个预见期 5 个土层深度(10cm、20cm、30cm、40cm和 50cm)的土壤相对湿度,以期为高标准农田土壤水分预估提供参考.结果表明:(1)冬小麦生长期内,河南省高标准农田 5 个土层深度土壤相对湿度呈波动下降趋势,播种-出苗期 5 个土层的土壤相对湿度的时段平均值最大(90.4%),抽穗-成熟期最小(73.9%).(2)河南省高标准农田土壤相对湿度对不同小气候要素响应时间与强弱不一致.其中,对 10cm、20cm和 50cm处地温响应最慢但最强,响应时间集中在 5~10d,相关系数为 0.32~0.57;对空气相对湿度的响应最快但最弱,响应时间集中在 1~3d,相关系数小于 0.20.随着土层深度增加,土壤相对湿度与降水量、日平均气温和日最高气温相关关系呈递减趋势,与日最大风速、3 个土层深处地温(10cm、20cm和 50cm)相关关系则逐渐增加.(3)不同预见期下 5 个土深处土壤相对湿度的模拟模型中,RF模型精度最高,决定系数(R2)为 0.87~0.98,均方根误差(RMSE)为 0.02~0.05,平均绝对误差(MAE)为 0.01~0.03;SVR模型次之(R2为 0.77~0.97,RMSE为 0.03~0.07,MAE为 0.02~0.04);BPNN模型精度较低(R2 为 0.60~0.97,RMSE为 0.04~0.07,MAE为 0.01~0.06).综合评价RF模型更适合高标准农田土壤墒情短期预测,可为河南高标准农田精准水分管理提供技术支撑.
This study utilized microclimate data from high-standard farmlands during wheat growing season(October to May)from 2021 to 2023.By investigating the lagged response of soil relative humidity(SRH)to microclimate factors,this study developed three machine learning models,Random Forest(RF),Backpropagation Neural Network(BPNN)and Support vector regression(SVR),using the Optuna framework for hyperparameter optimization.The models predicted SRH at three forecasting horizons(3-,5-and 10-days)across five soil depths(10cm,20cm,30cm,40cm and 50cm)to establish a predictive reference system for high-standard farmland.The results indicated that:(1)SRH exhibited a fluctuating decrease throughout winter wheat growth stages,with maximum values(90.4%)during sowing to emergence and minimum values(73.9%)at anthesis to maturity stage.(2)The response characteristics of SRH to microclimate factors varied significantly.SRH demonstrated the strongest yet slowest response to ground temperatures(r=0.32-0.57;5-10d lag),and the weakest yet fastest response to air relative humidity(r<0.20;1-3d lag).As soil depth increased,the correlation between SRH and precipitation,daily mean air temperature and daily maximum temperatures decreased,whereas correlations with maximum daily wind speed and soil temperatures(10cm,20cm and 50cm depths)increased gradually.(3)Among the three simulation models,the RF model achieved superior performance across all prediction horizons(R²=0.87-0.98,RMSE=0.02-0.05,MAE=0.01-0.03),significantly outperforming SVR(R2=0.77-0.97,RMSE=0.03-0.07,MAE=0.02-0.04)and BPNN(R2=0.60-0.97,RMSE=0.04-0.07,MAE=0.01-0.06).A comprehensive evaluation showed that the RF model was better suited for short-term predictions of soil moisture in high-standard farmland,providing valuable technical support for precise water management in Henan.
谢家旭;成林;刘志雄;董宛麟
湖北省气候中心,武汉 430070河南省气象科学研究所,郑州 450003湖北省气候中心,武汉 430070中国气象局气象干部培训学院,北京 100081
高标准农田小气候要素机器学习土壤相对湿度
High-standard farmlandMicroclimate factorMachine learningSoil relative humidity
《中国农业气象》 2026 (1)
73-82,10
中国气象局青年创新团队"高标准农田智慧气象保障技术"项目(CMA2024QN03)河南省科技攻关计划项目(252102320003)中国气象局创新发展专项项目(CXFZ2025J057)
评论