数智时代高校德育治理中的技治主义及其超越OA

Within the overall operational mechanism of universities dominated by meritocracy,moral education governance has been shaped and constrained by technocracy,which is grounded in the philosophy of merit.Advocating"scientific management"and"expert politics"technocracy appears to offer a solution to the dilemmas faced by moral education governance in higher education.In the contemporary context-characterized by the proliferation of data-driven governance in society and the erosion of the humanistic dimension of moral education-technocracy embeds its own technological rationality into students' behavioral regulation and ideological guidance on three levels:cultivating great virtues(Ming Dade),upholding public virtues(Shou Gongde),and maintaining private virtues(Yan Side).It constructs a quantifiable points-based system centered on comprehensive evaluation to enhance the visibility and manageability of moral education,while relying on the legitimacy of expert decision-making to ensure the orderly functioning of hierarchical moral education governance.However,while technocracy promotes the"scientification"of moral education governance,it also entails three significant risks:the reification of the intrinsic vitality of moral education,the suspension of intersubjectivity among moral education agents,and the obscuring of ethical standards.To mitigate these risks,moral education governance in universities must transcend technocracy and return to humanistic care,restoring the subjectivity of the human person.It should take value rationality as its ultimate orientation to overcome the domination of technological rationality,clarify the role of experts,and construct a moral education community.Through these measures,moral education can return to its core mission of cultivating virtue and educating people.