首页|期刊导航|阅江学刊|儒道论衡:一种原理的两种表达和共同认识格局

儒道论衡:一种原理的两种表达和共同认识格局OA

Confucian-Daoist Dialectic:Dual Expressions of a Single Principle and Their Shared Cognition Pattern

中文摘要英文摘要

在儒家和道家的对立表面下,掩藏着各自最高概念间的实质同一,造成二者差异的内容仅仅是对同一普遍原理的不同实现策略选择.但这种具体策略的确定不具有逻辑必然性,而是被其实践智慧本性的内在思维结构注定了某种主观性和偶然性,并且在逻辑上儒家和道家可以互换策略而无妨各自对仁和自然的标榜.然而,之所以会有儒道之间的持久划界并被看成独立的普遍原理之学,完全是因为某种实践策略的政治宗派化及其历史坚持所造成的传统化,更深层的根源则是对普遍和特殊的混淆.一旦哲学发明出清晰地分离普遍和特殊的方法,从而能够准确定义仁和自然概念,思想的真相便被敞开.但长久的遮蔽已经在儒家和道家内造成不可忽视的理论智慧和实践智慧的双重失落.

Beneath the apparent opposition between Confucianism and Daoism lies a substantive identity between their respective supreme concepts.The differences between them stem solely from divergent strategic choices in realizing the same universal principle.However,the determination of these specific strategies lacks logical necessity.Instead,the intrinsic cognitive structure of their practical wisdom inherently imposes a degree of subjectivity and contingency.Logically,Confucianism and Daoism could interchange strategies without compromising their respective claims to benevolence and naturalness.The enduring demarcation between Confucianism and Daoism,and their perception as distinct schools of universal principles,stems entirely from the politicized sectarianism of certain practical strategies and their historical persistence,which solidified into tradition.The deeper root lies in the tranquil confusion between the universal and the particular.Once philosophy invents a method to clearly separate the universal from the particular,thereby enabling precise definitions of benevolence and naturalness,the truth of thought is revealed.Yet prolonged obscurity has caused a significant loss of both theoretical and practical wisdom within Confucianism and Daoism.

崔平

上海师范大学哲学与法政学院

自然儒道关系儒家道家

《阅江学刊》 2026 (1)

28-36,9

评论