美国《芯片法案》中的投资话语传播与权力分析OA
Investment Discourse Communication and Power Analysis in the CHIPS Act of the United States
[目的]分析美国《芯片法案》制定中智库、媒体与立法机构三类话语权力主体围绕"投资"议题的语义互动与权力博弈,探究语义同质化与变异性的深层动因,为理解科技政策话语建构与权力运作提供理论参照.[方法]构建含"微观文本分析-中观话语实践-宏观社会实践"三个维度的三维分析框架,自建语料库运用Wmatrix语义标注系统,对三类话语进行语义域、高频词、搭配词分析及互文性追踪,揭示芯片投资话语中核心语义的动态传播路径.[结果/结论]研究发现,三类文本在"投资"语义域存在强化半导体制造与提高技术主权地位等同质化传播,但语义呈现显著变异:智库从战略理性出发,视投资为中美技术主权竞争与安全/效益权衡的工具;媒体受功能限制,将其简化为解决供应链短缺的经济投入与危机符号;立法机构则通过制度设计将其固化为服务国家安全优先的合规行为.这种变异根植于话语权力主体的功能差异与资源禀赋,其深层逻辑是技术主权竞争背景下"安全优先"逻辑对经济理性的压制,立法过程最终确立了国家安全原则的核心地位.
[Purpose]This study analyzes the semantic interactions and power games among three discursive power subjects—think tanks,media,and legislative bodies—around the issue of"investment"in the formulation of the CHIPS Act.It aims to explore the underlying drivers of semantic homogenization and variation,providing a theoretical reference for understanding the construction of science and tech-nology policy discourse and the operation of power.[Method]This study constructs a three-dimensional analytical framework encompass-ing"micro-textual analysis,meso-discursive practice,and macro-social practice."Using a self-compiled corpus and the Wmatrix se-mantic annotation system,it conducts analyses of semantic domains,high-frequency words,and collocations,as well as intertextuality tracking across three types of discourse,thereby revealing the dynamic communication pathways of core semantics within chip investment discourse.[Result/Conclusion]The study reveals significant semantic homogenization across the three text types within the"investment"semantic domain,particularly emphasizing the strengthening of semiconductor manufacturing and the elevation of technological sovereign-ty.However,notable semantic variations were identified:Think tanks,driven by strategic rationality,framed"investment"as a tool for U.S.-China technological sovereignty competition and a balance between security/benefit trade-offs.Media,constrained by functional limitations,simplified"investment"into an economic input to resolve supply chain shortages and a symbol of crisis.Legislative bodies,through institutional design,codified"investment"as a compliance behavior prioritizing national security.This variation is rooted in the functional disparities and resource endowments of the discursive actors.Its deeper logic lies in the"security-first"logic superseding eco-nomic rationality within the context of technological sovereignty competition.Ultimately,the legislative process established the core pri-macy of the national security principle.
谭光裕;陆丹云
国防科技大学外国语学院 南京 210039国防科技大学外国语学院 南京 210039
社会科学
《芯片法案》智库新闻媒体投资话语话语权力话语传播批评话语分析
the CHIPS Actthink tanksnews mediainvestment discoursediscourse powerdiscourse communicationcritical dis-course analysis
《情报杂志》 2026 (2)
82-96,15
全军军事理论(重点项目)"国防语言战略视阈下军事外语'训管用三位一体'战备机制建设"(编号:24-JSLLKY-068)湖南省高校教学改革研究项目"国防语言课程思政内涵式发展及贯通式实践探索"(编号:湘教-202502000046)研究成果.
评论