首页|期刊导航|国际口腔医学杂志|局部应用环孢素治疗口腔扁平苔藓的有效性和安全性的Meta分析

局部应用环孢素治疗口腔扁平苔藓的有效性和安全性的Meta分析OA

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of topical cyclosporine in the treatment of oral lichen planus

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 评价局部应用环孢素治疗口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)的有效性和安全性,为临床合理用药提供参考.方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国知网、万方和维普等数据库,并在线检索欧洲灰色文献信息系统(SIGLE)和ClinicalTrials网站,搜集所有关于环孢素治疗OLP的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时限均从建库至2023年3月25日.由2名评价者独立评价研究质量和提取数据,采用RevMan 5.4和STATA14.0软件进行Meta分析.结果 共纳入7项环孢素治疗OLP的RCT研究,包括317名患者.其中6项为比较环孢素和糖皮质激素,1项为比较环孢素和安慰剂.Meta分析结果显示,环孢素组和激素组临床有效率差异无统计学意义[风险比(RR)=0.87,95%置信区间(CI):0.67~1.14,P=0.32].治疗4周后,环孢素组和激素组疼痛评分改善差异无统计学意义(标准化均数差=-0.23,95%CI:-0.54~0.07,P=0.13).环孢素组和激素组的不良反应发生率相比,差异无统计学意义(RR=0.71,95%CI:0.18~2.79,P=0.62).结论 当前证据显示,与糖皮质激素相比,环孢素在临床有效率、疼痛评分改善和安全性方面无优势.受纳入研究数量和质量的限制,上述结论还需更多高质量研究予以验证.

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical cyclosporine in the treatment of oral lichen planus(OLP)and to provide reference for clinicians.Methods Databases,such as Pubmed,Embase,The Co-chrane Library,Web of Science,CNKI,WanFang Data,and VIP,were searched.The System for Information on Grey Li-terature in Europe(SIGLE)and ClinicalTrials websites were searched online to collect randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of cyclosporine for OLP from the establishment of the database to March 25,2023.Two reviewers independently evalua-ted the study quality and extracted data,and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan(version 5.4)and STATA(ver-sion 14.0)software.Results A total of seven RCT studies on cyclosporine in the treatment of OLP were included,in-cluding 317 patients.Among them,six compared cyclo-sporine with corticosteroid,and one compared cyclospo-rine with placebo.Meta-analysis results showed no sta-tistically significant difference in clinical effectiveness between the cyclosporine and corticosteroid groups[risk ratio(RR)=0.87,95%confidence interval(CI):0.67-1.14,P=0.32].After 4 weeks of treatment,no statistically significant difference was observed in the improvement of pain scores between the cyclosporine and corticosteroid groups(standardized mean difference=-0.23,95%CI:-0.54-0.07,P=0.13).No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of adverse reactions between the cyclosporine and corticosteroid groups(RR=0.71,95%CI:0.18-2.79,P=0.62).Conclusion Current evidence shows that cyclosporine has no advantage over corticosteroid in terms of clinical efficacy,improvement in pain scores,and safety.More high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion due to limitations in the quantity and quality of included studies.

汪星;李莎;郭锦材

长沙市口腔医院药剂科 湖南中医药大学口腔医学院 长沙 410006长沙市口腔医院药剂科 湖南中医药大学口腔医学院 长沙 410006长沙市口腔医院药剂科 湖南中医药大学口腔医学院 长沙 410006

医药卫生

口腔扁平苔藓环孢素系统评价Meta分析

oral lichen planuscyclosporinesystematic reviewMeta-analysis

《国际口腔医学杂志》 2026 (1)

51-58,8

Nature Science Foundation of Hunan Province(2024JJ9532)Hunan University of Chinese Medicine Re-search Fund Project(2022XYLH134) 湖南省自然科学基金(2024JJ9532)湖南中医药大学校院联合基金项目(2022XYLH134)

10.7518/gjkq.2026206

评论