类别和语义距离调节预期对记忆的影响OA
Category and semantic distance modulate the impact of prediction on memory
人类经常需要根据当前的情景做出预测,以指导后续的行为.然而,目前研究者关于可预测和不可预测的记忆表现孰好孰坏争论不休.在本研究中(实验 1:项目再认;实验 2:联结再认),我们通过类别和语义距离操纵预期,考察了不同预期程度下的记忆表现.两个实验一致表明,在学习阶段,参与者加工符合类别规则的项目时正确率更高,反应时更短.实验2发现,语义距离越近,P600(语义整合的ERP指标)越正.两个实验中,多变量模式分析表明不同条件下的神经表征存在显著差异.两个实验均发现,随着类别规则的违反和语义距离的增加,学习阶段N400(预测程度的ERP指标)的波幅变得更负,测验阶段的记忆表现变得更差.此外,学习阶段的N400可以显著预测记忆表现.这些结果表明,类别和语义距离通过不同的机制调节预期对记忆的影响:类别通过调节编码负担影响记忆,而语义距离通过调节语义整合影响记忆.这些发现为解决可预测与不可预测项目在记忆表现上的争论提供了新的视角.
Humans often make predictions based on current contexts to guide subsequent behavior.However,there is ongoing debate about whether predictable or unpredictable items lead to better memory performance.Some researchers have found better memory performance for predictable items,while others have found better memory performance for unpredictable items.The present study used EEG to examine the relationship between encoding sub-processes and memory performance across different levels of predictability.This provides a new perspective on resolving the discrepancy in memory performance between predictable and unpredictable items. We manipulated predictability through category and semantic distance to examine memory performance under different levels of predictability(Experiment 1:item recognition;Experiment 2:associative recognition).Specifically,we set up 3 conditions:C+S+(e.g.furniture:sofa,within-category and near semantic distance),C-S+(e.g.furniture:decoration,out-of-category and near semantic distance),and C-S-(e.g.furniture:phase,out-of-category and far semantic distance).In the study phase,prime words(e.g.,furniture)and target words(e.g.,sofa)were presented sequentially.Participants were asked to judge which condition each word pair belonged to by pressing the corresponding key when the target word appeared.In the test phase,28 participants completed an item recognition test and 26 participants completed an associative recognition test. In the study phase,both experiments consistently showed higher accuracy and faster reaction times in the C+S+and C-S-conditions than in the C-S+condition.The N400 amplitudes became progressively more negative across the C+S+,C-S+,and C-S-conditions.In Experiment 2,the P600 amplitude was more positive in the C+S+and C-S+conditions compared to the C-S-condition.In both experiments,linear discriminant analysis(LDA)successfully distinguished neural representations across conditions during the N400 and P600 time windows.In the test phase,item recognition(Experiment 1)and associative recognition(Experiment 2)both showed a graded decline in memory performance across the C+S+,C-S+,and C-S-conditions.In addition,both experiments consistently showed that N400 amplitudes during the study phase significantly predicted memory performance in the test phase. In conclusion,these results suggest that category and semantic distance modulate the influence of prediction on memory through different mechanisms:category may influence memory by modulating encoding burden,while semantic distance may influence memory performance through semantic integration.These findings not only support the view that predictable items have better memory performance,but also suggest that the divergence between predictable and unpredictable memory performance may arise from the relative contributions of two independent factors:encoding difficulty and encoding effort.
代矫剑;孙明泽;王东方;毛新瑞;郭春彦
首都师范大学心理学院,北京市"学习与认知"重点实验室,北京 100048华南师范大学心理学院/华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广州 510631华南师范大学心理学院/华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广州 510631首都师范大学初等教育学院,北京 100048首都师范大学心理学院,北京市"学习与认知"重点实验室,北京 100048
社会科学
类别规则语义距离预期再认EEG
category rulessemantic distancepredictionrecognitionEEG
《心理学报》 2026 (1)
1-14,14
国家自然科学基金资助项目(31671127).
评论