融合学科关联度的期刊跨学科评价指标研究OA
Research on Interdisciplinary Journal Evaluation Metrics Integrating Disciplinary Association
[目的/意义]针对跨学科期刊评价忽视引用学科倾向性的局限性,构建能够反映学科关联并兼顾标准化影响力的新指标.[方法/过程]提出了综合测度跨学科相对互引量、引文时效性及平衡性的学科关联度指数DAI,结合平均标准化引用得分MNCS构建跨学科得分I Score,并选取2000-2020年材料科学综合、计算机人工智能及图书情报领域的342种期刊开展实证.[结果/结论]I Score 可提供细粒度的期刊跨学科相对影响力矩阵.同时,基于PageRank算法的I Score p能够识别在跨学科引用中承担桥梁角色的期刊及"高被引、低跨学科影响"的期刊,一定程度上缓解了引用的学科倾向性.
[Purpose/Significance]To address the limitation of interdisciplinary journal evaluations that overlook disci-plinary bias in citations,the study constructs a new metric that reflects disciplinary association while accounting for stan-dardized impact.[Methods/Process]The paper proposed the Discipline Association Index(DAI),a composite measure integrating interdisciplinary relative citation volume,citation timeliness,and citation balance.By combining DAI with the Mean Normalized Citation Score(MNCS),the study constructed the Interdisciplinary Score(I Score).Empirical validation was conducted on 342 journals across Materials Science-Multidisciplinary,Computer Science-Artificial Intelligence,and Information Science&Library Science from 2000 to 2020.[Result/Conclusion]The I Score provides a fine-grained inter-disciplinary relative influence matrix of journals.Meanwhile,I Score p based on the PageRank algorithm can identify jour-nals that serve as bridges in cross-disciplinary citations and those exhibiting"high citation counts but low interdisciplinary influence",thereby mitigating disciplinary bias in citations to some extent.
刘芳霖;荣国阳;姚志臻
武汉大学信息管理学院,湖北 武汉 430072武汉大学信息管理学院,湖北 武汉 430072||新加坡国立大学数学系,新加坡 119076武汉大学新闻与传播学院,湖北 武汉 430072
社会科学
期刊评价跨学科评价学科关联度标准化
journal evaluationinterdisciplinary evaluationdisciplinary associationstandardization
《现代情报》 2026 (1)
162-172,11
国家社会科学基金项目"跨学科知识流动中学科势能动能对学科发展的影响研究"(项目编号:23BTQ053)国家自然科学基金面上项目"基于注意力机制的学术信息动态推荐研究"(项目编号:72074109).
评论