首页|期刊导航|现代情报|悖论存在与理性消解:移动健康App用户持续隐私披露行为影响机制研究

悖论存在与理性消解:移动健康App用户持续隐私披露行为影响机制研究OA

The Existence of Paradox and Rationality Resolution:Study on the Influencing Mechanism of Continuous Privacy Disclosure Behavior of Mobile Health App Users

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的/意义]研究移动健康App用户的持续隐私披露行为和隐私悖论现象,有助于为保护健康隐私安全和用户画像分析提供决策支持.[方法/过程]本文基于隐私计算理论和期望确认理论,研究移动健康App用户持续隐私披露行为的影响机制.在验证"隐私关注—持续披露意愿—持续披露行为"这一隐私悖论形成路径的基础上,引入理性程度作为调节变量,分析其在隐私悖论路径中的消解作用.通过情景实验法收集951份样本数据,运用结构方程模型(SEM)和模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)的混合方法进行实证检验.[结果/结论]研究结果表明,感知风险负向影响期望确认,而感知收益正向影响期望确认和持续隐私披露意愿."隐私关注—持续披露意愿—持续披露行为"的路径系数均为正显著,且持续披露意愿起到完全中介作用,同时,期望确认正向影响隐私关注,表明虽然存在隐私悖论现象,但该现象的影响程度较小.理性程度仅对隐私关注和持续披露意愿之间的关系有负向调节作用,其对隐私悖论现象有部分消解作用.此外,在组态视角下,发现5条影响持续隐私披露行为的组态路径,分别为感知收益驱动、感知风险驱动、期望确认前的计算、期望确认后的权衡和理性程度驱动.

[Purpose/Significance]Studying the continuous privacy disclosure behavior and privacy paradox pheno-menon of mobile health app users contribute to decision-making support for protecting health privacy security and user pro-file analysis.[Method/Process]The study examined factors influencing mobile health app users'continuous privacy disclo-sure behavior based on privacy calculus theory and expectation confirmation theory.This study validated the formation pathway of the privacy paradox,which included"privacy concern-continuous disclosure intention-continuous disclosure behavior."Additionally,the study introduced rationality degree as a moderating variable to explore its mitigating effect on the privacy paradox.The study collected 951 samples through a scenario-based experiment and conducted an empirical analysis using a hybrid approach that combined Structural Equation Modeling(SEM)and Fuzzy-set Qualitative Compara-tive Analysis(fsQCA).[Result/Conclusion]The study finds that perceived risk negatively affects expectation confirmation,whereas perceived benefit positively affects both expectation confirmation and continuous privacy disclosure intention.The path coefficients of"privacy concern-continuous disclosure intention-continuous disclosure behavior"are positive and sig-nificant,with continuous disclosure intention playing a complete mediating role.Additionally,expectation confirmation positively influences privacy concern,suggesting that although the privacy paradox exists,its impact remains relatively minor.Rationality degree negatively moderates the relationship between privacy concern and continuous disclosure inten-tion,indicating that it partially mitigates the privacy paradox.From a configurational perspective,the study identifies five distinct paths that influence continuous privacy disclosure behavior:perceived benefit-driven,perceived risk-driven,pre-expectation confirmation calculation,post-expectation confirmation trade-off,and rationality-driven approaches.

李凤景;朱光;吴晗逸

南京大学信息管理学院,江苏 南京 210023南京信息工程大学管理工程学院,江苏 南京 210044东南大学经济管理学院,江苏 南京 211189

社会科学

移动健康App持续隐私披露行为隐私悖论理性程度隐私悖论消解

mobile health appcontinuous privacy disclosure behaviorprivacy paradoxrationality degreeprivacy paradox resolution

《现代情报》 2026 (1)

101-116,16

国家社会科学基金项目"个人健康数据的隐私悖论消解及分级流通增值研究"(项目编号:24BTQ027).

10.3969/j.issn.1008-0821.2026.01.009

评论