基于组合赋权的网联HUD预警系统综合效用评价方法OA北大核心
Evaluation of Comprehensive Utility of Connected HUD Warning System Based on Combination Weighting Method
为解决平视显示(head-up display,HUD)预警系统有效性评价维度单一、量化不足的问题,依托搭建的驾驶模拟平台,设计开发城市道路行人过街网联实验场景和三种预警系统(baseline/低头显示(head-down dis-play,HDD)/HUD),实验测试获取驾驶人视觉、行为和主观数据;基于人因工程学、系统工程理论和交通工程学,结合驾驶人对于HUD预警系统的实际需求,从系统的安全、可靠、平稳及高效4个维度提取制动反应时间、后侵占时间、最大瞳孔面积、单位分心指数和恢复速度等10个典型关键指标建立综合评估指标体系;采用基于层次分析法(analytic hierarchy process,AHP)-熵权法(entropy weight method,EWM)的主客观赋权法,确定评估指标体系的组合权重;最后采用模糊综合评价方法量化3种预警系统在行人过街事件中的单一维度效用和综合效用.单一维度效用结果显示,HDD和HUD在4种维度上的效用表现存在差异,单一维度量化无法全面评估预警系统效用.具体而言,HDD和HUD系统在安全性得分上相较于Baseline条件分别提高了6.25%和18.98%;在可靠性方面,HDD略有下降0.61%,而HUD提高了1.97%;在稳定性上,HDD和HUD得分分别提高了5.97%和10.99%;在高效性方面,HDD和HUD得分分别下降了2.47%和3.5%,其中HUD表现相对较差.综合效用结果表明,在行人过街事件中,与基线条件相比,HDD和HUD系统的综合效用值分别提升了1.86%和6.36%.相比而言,HUD在兼顾安全、可靠、平稳和高效方面更具有优势,但未来HUD预警系统的设计仍需重点权衡安全与效率的关系.
To solve the problem of single evaluation dimensions and insufficient quantification of the effectiveness of head-up display(HUD)warning systems,a driving simulation platform is developed to design and develop urban road pedestrian crossing connected experimental scenarios and three warning systems(baseline/head-down display(HDD)/HUD).The experimental tests obtained visual and behavioral data of drivers.Based on human factors engi-neering,systems engineering theory,and traffic engineering,combined with the actual needs of drivers for HUD warning systems,a comprehensive evaluation index system is established by extracting 10 typical key indicators from the four dimensions of system safety,reliability,stability,and efficiency,including braking response time,post encroachment time,maximum pupil area,average distraction index,and recovery speed.The subjective and objec-tive weighting method based on analytic hierarchy process(AHP)-entropy weight method(EWM)is used to deter-mine the combined weights of the evaluation index system.Finally,the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to quantify the single dimensional utility and comprehensive utility of the three warning systems in pedestrian crossing incidents.The results of single dimensional utility show that there are differences in the utility performance of HDD and HUD in four dimensions,and single dimensional quantification cannot comprehensively evaluate the utility of warning systems.Specifically,the HDD and HUD systems have improved their security scores by 6.25%and 18.98%respectively compared to the Baseline conditions;In terms of reliability,HDD slightly decreased by 0.61%,while HUD increased by 1.97%;In terms of stability,HDD and HUD scores increased by 5.97%and 10.99%,respectively;In terms of efficiency,HDD and HUD scores decreased by 2.47%and 3.5%respectively,with HUD performing relatively poorly.The comprehensive utility results indicate that in pedestrian crossing incidents,the comprehensive utility values of HDD and HUD systems increased by 1.86%and 6.36%respectively compared to Baseline conditions.In comparison,HUD has more advantages in balancing safety,reliability,stability,and effi-ciency,but the design of HUD warning systems in the future still needs to focus on balancing the relationship be-tween safety and efficiency.
王彦峰;张钰;赵晓华;杨艳群
北京交通运输职业学院汽车经济管理系 北京 102618北京工业大学交通工程北京市重点实验室 北京 100124北京工业大学交通工程北京市重点实验室 北京 100124福州大学土木工程学院 福州 350116
交通工程
网联环境平视显示器(HUD)综合效用评价AHP-EWM组合赋权法模糊综合评价指标体系
connected environmenthead-up display(HUD)comprehensive utility evaluationAHP-EWM combi-native weighting methodfuzzy comprehensive evaluationindex system
《交通信息与安全》 2025 (3)
74-84,99,12
国家自然科学基金项目(52072012)资助
评论