Comparison of various prediction models in the effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Chinese population 5 years after surgeryOACSTPCDMEDLINE

Background:The effect of bariatric surgery on type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM)control can be assessed based on predictive models of T2DM remission.Various models have been externally verified internationally.However,long-term validated results after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG)surgery are lacking.The best model for the Chinese population is also unknown.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed Chinese population data 5 years after LSG at Beijing Shijitan Hospital in China between March 2009 and December 2016.The independent t-test,Mann–Whitney U test,and chi-squared test were used to compare characteristics between T2DM remission and non-remission groups.We evaluated the predictive efficacy of each model for longterm T2DM remission after LSG by calculating the area under the curve(AUC),sensitivity,specificity,Youden index,positive predictive value(PPV),negative predictive value(NPV),and predicted-to-observed ratio,and performed calibration using Hosmer–Lemeshow test for 11 prediction models.Results:We enrolled 108 patients,including 44(40.7%)men,with a mean age of 35.5 years.The mean body mass index was 40.3±9.1 kg/m^(2),the percentage of excess weight loss(%EWL)was(75.9±30.4)%,and the percentage of total weight loss(%TWL)was(29.1±10.6)%.The mean glycated hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c)level was(7.3±1.8)%preoperatively and decreased to(5.9±1.0)%5 years after LSG.The 5-year postoperative complete and partial remission rates of T2DM were 50.9%[55/108]and 27.8%[30/108],respectively.Six models,i.e.,"ABCD",individualized metabolic surgery(IMS),advanced-DiaRem,DiaBetter,Dixon et al’s regression model,and Panunzi et al’s regression model,showed a good discrimination ability(all AUC>0.8).The"ABCD"(sensitivity,74%;specificity,80%;AUC,0.82[95%confidence interval[CI]:0.74–0.89]),IMS(sensitivity,78%;specificity,84%;AUC,0.82[95%CI:0.73–0.89]),and Panunzi et al’s regression models(sensitivity,78%;specificity,91%;AUC,0.86[95%CI:0.78–0.92])showed good discernibility.In the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test,except for DiaRem(P<0.01),DiaBetter(P<0.01),Hayes et al(P=0.03),Park et al(P=0.02),and Ramos-Levi et al’s(P<0.01)models,all models had a satifactory fit results(P>0.05).The P values of calibration results of the"ABCD"and IMS were 0.07 and 0.14,respectively.The predicted-to-observed ratios of the"ABCD"and IMS were 0.87 and 0.89,respectively.Conclusion:The prediction model IMS was recommended for clinical use because of excellent predictive performance,good statistical test results,and simple and practical design features.