论文检索
期刊
全部知识仓储预印本开放期刊机构
高级检索

罗浮山风湿膏药治疗类风湿关节炎的药物经济学评价OA

Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of the Luofushan Rheumatism Plaster Patch in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 对罗浮山风湿膏药治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)进行经济学评价,为国家医保药品目录遴选、基本药物目录遴选、药品价格制定提供依据.方法 基于罗浮山风湿膏药多中心随机双盲对照临床研究数据、药智网数据以及公开发表的文献数据,构建决策树(4 周、8 周)和Markov模型(20 年).干预组为罗浮山风湿膏药联合RA基础治疗,对照组为RA基础治疗.研究角度为医疗保障支付方视角.健康产出包括第 8 周视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分降低值、质量调整生命天(QALDs)和质量调整生命年(QALYs).成本包括直接医疗成本,以 2022 年人均国内生产总值(GDP)的 3 倍作为意愿支付(WTP)阈值.通过单因素和概率敏感性分析验证基础分析的稳健性.结果 基于第 8 周VAS评分降低值的成本-效果分析结果显示,罗浮山组相比对照组的增量成本-效果比(ICER)为 3.02 元(约为 0.000 1 倍 2022 年居民可支配收入).决策树分析模型结果显示,罗浮山组与对照组相比第 4 周和第 8 周的ICER分别为 25.71 元/QALD、16.59 元/QALD,根据阈值(2022 年人均GDP/365 d=234.79 元/d)判断,增加的成本是值得的.Markov模型分析结果显示,罗浮山组相比对照组的ICER为 52 107.21 元/QALY,根据阈值判断(<1 倍人均GDP),增加的成本是值得的.结论 罗浮山风湿膏药联合RA基础治疗与RA基础治疗相比,是成本较高、获益多的方案,根据阈值判断,增加的成本是值得的,具有经济学优势.

Objective To evaluate the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis(RA)with Luofushan rheumatic plaster in economics,and to provide basis for the selection of national medical insurance drug list,essential drug list and drug price.Methods Based on multicenter randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial data of the Luofushan Rheumatism Plaster Patch,along with Drug Intelligence Network(DI-net)data and publicly available literature,a decision tree(at 4 weeks and 8 weeks)and a Markov model(over 20 years)were developed.The intervention group received the Luofushan Rheumatism Plaster Patch in combination with foundational therapy,while the control group received foundational therapy alone.The study focused on the perspective of healthcare payers.Health outcomes were assessed based on the reduction in visual analog scale(VAS)score at week 8,quality-adjusted life-days(QALDs),and quality-adjusted life-years(QALYs).Costs included direct medical costs,with a willingness-to-pay threshold set at three times the per capita gross domestic product(GDP)for the year 2022.Sensitivity analyses,including univariate and probabilistic analyses,were conducted to assess the robustness of the base analysis.Results The cost-effectiveness analysis results of the reduction in VAS score at week 8 showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER)of the Luofushan group compared to the control group was 3.02 yuan(approximately 0.000 1 times the per capita disposable income in 2022).The decision tree analysis results at week 4 and week 8 demonstrated that the ICER for the Luofushan group compared to the control group was 25.71 yuan/QALD and 16.59 yuan/QALD,respectively.Based on the threshold(2022 per capita GDP divided by 365 days = 234.79 yuan/day),the additional costs were considered worthwhile.The Markov model analysis revealed an ICER of 52 107.21 yuan/QALY for the Luofushan group compared to the control group.According to the threshold,the increased costs were deemed justified.Conclusion Compared with RA basic treatment,Luofushan rheumatism plaster combined with RA basic treatment is a program with higher cost and more benefits.Judging from the threshold value,the increased cost is worthwhile and has economic advantages.

潘婕;韩千禧;张欣颖;杨倩;朱文涛

北京中医药大学中医学院,北京 102401||北京中医药大学管理学院,北京 102401北京中医药大学管理学院,北京 102401

临床医学

罗浮山风湿膏药;类风湿关节炎;药物经济学;成本-效果分析;马尔可夫模型

Luofushan rheumatism plaster patch;Rheumatoid arthritis;Pharmacoeconomic evaluation;Cost-effectiveness analysis;Markov model

《中国药物经济学》 2024 (004)

9-16 / 8

10.12010/j.issn.1673-5846.2024.04.002

评论

下载量:0
点击量:0