论文检索
期刊
全部知识仓储预印本开放期刊机构
高级检索

注射用头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠原研药与仿制药的有效性和安全性评价OA

Effectiveness and Safety Evaluation of Original and Generic Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium for Injection

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 利用真实世界数据对注射用头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠原研药与仿制药的有效性和安全性进行评价.方法 回顾性收集大理大学第一附属医院 2022 年 3 月至 2023 年 2 月使用过注射用头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠原研药(商品名:舒普深)或仿制药(商品名:凡林)的住院患者信息,根据用药品种分为舒普深组与凡林组,利用倾向性评分匹配(PSM)法平衡两组组间差异后,比较两组的有效性和安全性.结果 根据纳排标准共纳入1777 例患者,舒普深组560 例,凡林组1217 例;经PSM后,两组各纳入477 例.有效性评价结果显示,舒普深组与凡林组临床有效率(75.9%vs.78.2%,P=0.397)、细菌清除率(69.6%vs.53.1%,P=0.220)、各项感染指标降低率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),用药后舒普深组C反应蛋白(CRP)和中性粒细胞绝对值(NEUT)降低程度高于凡林组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);安全性评价结果显示,两组不良事件发生率(0.8%vs.1.3%,P=0.525)、肝功能及血液系统指标异常率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 注射用头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠原研药与仿制药在临床应用中的有效性无明显差异,且安全性相当.

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the original drug and the generic drug of Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium for Injection using real-world data.Methods Retrospective collection of information on inpatients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University who had used the original drug(product name:Sulperazon)or generic drug(product name:Valin)of Cefoperazone sodium sulbactam sodium for injection from March 2022 to February 2023.The inpatient information was divided into Sulperazon group and Valin group according to drug varieties.The effectiveness and safety of the two groups were compared by using PSM method to balance the differences between the two groups.Results A total of 1777 patients were enrolled based on the Inclusion and exclusion criteria,with 560 in the Sulperazon group and 1217 in the Valin group.Following propensity score matching,477 patients were included in each group.The evaluation of effectiveness indicated no statistically significant differences between the two groups in clinical effectiveness rate(75.9%vs.78.2%,P=0.397),bacterial clearance rate(69.6%vs.53.1%,P=0.220),nor the reduction rate of various infection indicators(P>0.05).C-reactive protein(CRP)and neutrophils(NEUT)were reduced to a larger extent in the Sulperazon group than in the Valin group after the application of the drug,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The safety evaluation results displayed a comparable incidence rate of adverse events between the two groups(0.8%vs.1.3%,P=0.525),as well as similar incidence rates of liver function and blood system abnormality indicators(P>0.05).Conclusion There was no significant difference in effectiveness between the original Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium for Injection and the generic in clinical applications,and the two drugs have comparable safety.

刘喆;马慧慧;李丹;徐磊;杨亮蕊

大理大学药学院,云南大理 671000大理大学第一附属医院药剂科,云南大理 671000

药学

注射用头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠;原研药;仿制药;倾向性评分匹配;真实世界研究

Original drugs;Generic drugs;Propensity score matching;Real-world study

《中国药物经济学》 2024 (002)

32-37 / 6

云南省教育厅科学研究基金(2023J0962)

10.12010/j.issn.1673-5846.2024.02.006

评论

下载量:0
点击量:2